Multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the pocket-creation method with and without single-clip traction of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: The pocket-creation method (PCM) was developed to overcome the technical difficulties of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), although opening the pocket remains challenging. We developed a novel technique of PCM with single-clip traction (PCM-CT), which uses a reopenable clip as a traction device to maintain stability during the procedure. No prospective study has compared the efficacy of PCM-CT and PCM. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of PCM-CT vs. PCM in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at four Japanese institutions. Patients with superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions were included following Japanese guidelines for colorectal cancer. Seven moderately experienced endoscopists performed the ESD procedures using either PCM-CT or PCM. RESULTS: 100 patients were enrolled in the study. Compared with PCM, PCM-CT achieved significantly faster mean (SD) dissection speed (21.4 [10.8] vs. 27.0 [14.5] mm2/min [95%CI 0.5 to 10.7], P = 0.03), and reduced the mean procedure time (81.8 [57.9] vs. 64.8 [47.6] minutes [95%CI -38.2 to 4.3], P = 0.12) and pocket-opening time (37.8 [33.0] vs. 30.0 [28.9] minutes [95%CI -20.2 to 4.6], P = 0.22). En bloc and R0 resection rates were not significantly different between the two groups (100% vs. 100%, P >0.99; 100% vs. 96%, P = 0.50, respectively). No significant differences were observed in adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSION: ESD facilitated by the novel PCM-CT method appeared to be significantly faster than PCM. Both methods achieved high R0 resection rates.

Reopenable clip-over-the-line method for closing large mucosal defects following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A feasibility study.

Background and study aims Complete closure of large defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be problematic, especially in challenging areas or lesions larger than half the lumen circumference. We report a reopenable clip-over-the-line method for such defects and aim to investigate its feasibility through a case series. Patients and methods We retrospectively evaluated data from 30 consecutive patients who underwent ESD with defect closure using the reopenable clip-over-the-line method between October 2020 and September 2022. This method requires the first clip-with-line grasp of the oral side's defect edge and muscle layer. The next reopenable clip (with a line fed through a hole in the reopenable clip tooth) is placed on the opposing mucosal defect edge and muscle layer. This process is repeated until complete closure. The primary study outcome was the rate of complete mucosal defect closure. We also reported post-procedure bleeding or perforation. Results The median dimensions of the resected specimens were 45 mm (range, 35-70) by 39 mm (range, 29-60). Complete closure was achieved for all defects, including nine rectal defects, of which three bordered the anal verge. Of the 30 defects included in this study, nine were larger than half the lumen circumference. The median closure time was 25 minutes (range, 14-52), and the median clip number was 17 (range, 9-42). No post-procedure bleeding or perforation occurred. Conclusions The reopenable clip-over-the-line method is a feasible technique for the complete closure of large colorectal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection, regardless of location.

Correction: Reopenable clip-over-the-line method for closing large mucosal defects following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A feasibility study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-2095-0033.].

Full-thickness resection closure using reopenable-clip over-the-line method inside a submucosal pocket.

Video 1Full-thickness defect resection closure using the reopenable-clip over-the-line method inside a submucosal pocket in the porcine stomach.

Endoscopic Laryngopharyngeal Surgery Combined with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as a Treatment Option for Superficial Hypopharyngeal Cancer with Suspected Synchronous Lymph Node Metastasis.

We report 4 cases of hypopharyngeal cancer preoperatively suspected with synchronous lymph node metastases. Pathologic lymph node metastasis was confirmed in three of the four cases. All 4 cases underwent endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS) combined with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and subsequent lymph node dissection as an optional treatment rather than the standard treatment. Peroral resection for primary site was selected because of the expected decline in quality of life (QoL) after radical surgery. Among 4 patients, one developed local recurrence; however, the other three remained recurrence-free and survived without any additional treatment. Furthermore, the patient who developed local recurrence had a recurrence-free survival for more than 5 years, with additional chemoradiation therapy. No disorders in speech, swallowing, or breathing was observed during the follow-up period. ELPS combined with ESD is generally indicated for laryngopharyngeal cancer without synchronous lymph node metastasis. However, this can be a treatment option for patients may wish to preserve a greater QoL after treatment. In the future, when more data on the results and long-term prognosis of this treatment are accumulated, it may be possible to discuss its validity further.

Suturing techniques with endoscopic clips and special devices after endoscopic resection.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established method for complete resection of large and early gastrointestinal tumors. However, methods to reduce bleeding, perforation, and other adverse events after endoscopic resection (ER) have not yet been defined. Mucosal defect closure is often performed endoscopically with a clip. Recently, reopenable clips and large-teeth clips have also been developed. The over-the-scope clip enables complete defect closure by withdrawing the endoscope once and attaching the clip. Other methods involve attaching the clip-line or a ring with an anchor to appose the edges of the mucosal defect, followed by the use of an additional clip for defect closure. Since clips are limited by their grasping force and size, other methods, such as endoloop closure, endoscopic ligation with O-ring closure, and the reopenable clip over-the-line method, have been developed. In recent years, techniques often utilized for full-thickness ER of submucosal tumors have been widely used in full-thickness defect closure. Specialized devices and techniques for defect closure have also been developed, including the curved needle and line, stitches, and an endoscopic tack and suture device. These clips and suture devices are applied for defect closure in emergency endoscopy, accidental perforations, and acute and chronic fistulas. Although endoscopic defect closure with clips has a high success rate, endoscopists need to simplify and promote endoscopic closure techniques to prevent adverse events after ER.